Reflection¶
- The learners were nearly twice as fast than the cohort of 2024-01-18:
| Time | Start of section |
|---|---|
| 09:30 | 1. Use the Python script' |
| 09:50 | 2. Way of the program' |
| 10:15 | 3. Working with Python scripts' |
| 10:45 | 4. VET 1: variables |
| 11:30 | 5. VET 2: operators |
| 13:15 | 6. VET 3: user input |
| 13:45 | 7. Hello little turtle |
| 14:30 | 8. File I/O |
| ? | 9. Command-line arguments |
| ? | 10. Graphics |
| ? | Functions -> no, send home! |
This makes me wonder: can I stop earlier with them?
- Pro: reward for working hard
- Con: they expect a full day of work, I can give them a learning environment the full day
I feel that functions can be skipped, as there we leave the domain of an intro course.
- [x] Weak prior of exercise VET 2: operators
- [x] Add better ones to course material
- [x] I already did so, I just forgot to
git push
- I feel there are too much splits in the sessions. Should I clump those together yes/no? Let's see if this comes up at the evaluation!
I made the learners start evaluating at 15:15, as I saw they could not learn effectively anymore. I think that this shows I've made the (lack of even more) learning visible.